Contact Us

Outrageous Adventures Guide Service
c/o Kerry & Dawn Konold
PO Box 412
Mobridge, SD 57601
(605)-762-3474
outrageous_adventures@hotmail.com
Map
GPS Coordinates: N 45 30.567',W 100 18.544'

Directions from Mobridge, SD:

7.5 mi about 13 mins

From: Mobridge, S Dakota (A)

  1. Head east on W Grand Crossing/SD-20/US-12 toward 1st Ave W - Continue to follow SD-20/US-12 4.3 mi
  2. Turn right at SD-1804 3.2 mi

To: 130th St/SD-1804 (B)

Or - Click here for directions from your location of choice



Share on Facebook subscribe feed

Top 20 White Houses Raises last year

by , Posted to on 08/29/2011 08:54 AM | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/10/2006
Location: ND

I joined the military not only to fight for my country but to fight for those that can't fight for themselves. Thats why I'm here.

Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 09:21 AM | Reply #1 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/27/2004
Location: ND
The raises are totally justified.  Look at all the great work the admin is doing.  
"The only enemy of guns is rust and politicians."
“You can roll manure in powered sugar but it still ain’t a jelly donut”

"The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry."

William F. Buckley, Jr.
"Unarmed helplessness is for sheep and the French."  Ted Nugent



Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 10:17 AM | Reply #2 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/10/2006
Location: ND
Never thought of it that way 3X thank you for enlightening me. I wonder what Fishman would say about this.

I joined the military not only to fight for my country but to fight for those that can't fight for themselves. Thats why I'm here.

Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 10:22 AM | Reply #3 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/27/2004
Location: ND
Birdhunter81 Said:
Never thought of it that way 3X thank you for enlightening me. I wonder what Fishman would say about this.
I will speculate he is in 100% agreement with my sarcastic comment.    Except the sarcasm aspect of course.

"The only enemy of guns is rust and politicians."
“You can roll manure in powered sugar but it still ain’t a jelly donut”

"The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry."

William F. Buckley, Jr.
"Unarmed helplessness is for sheep and the French."  Ted Nugent



Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 10:25 AM | Reply #4 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 02/18/2004
Location: ND
I dont think they pay them enough for having to hang around that grade a numeral uno douche bag, they call the POTUS
 

If we're not supposed to eat animals, how come they're made out of meat?

Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 11:06 AM | Reply #5 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 12/30/2010
Location: nd
Maybe you people should check fact check . org or at least empty your spam e-mail.s a chart claiming to show the "top 20 raises" to White House staffers accurate?

A: It's misleading. The salary increases for 19 of the 21 employees listed resulted from promotions. Average pay for White House staff actually declined.

FULL QUESTION

Please check date and accuracy of raises to executive staff. Thank you.

White House Raises . . . What!
Observe the raises given to Obama Administrative Staff below !
⬐ Click to expand/collapse the full text ⬏

FULL ANSWER

A larger version of the chart can be found here at Gawker — a gossip site that published the chart to accompany a July 6 article headlined "White House Staffers Got a Raise Last Year, And You Did Not." The White House told Gawker that the new salaries were the result of promotions or increased work responsibilities. We reviewed the White House salary data and found that 19 of the 21 staffers listed in the chart received both salary increases and new job titles. (Yes, there were 21 staffers, not 20, in the chart.) The majority of those promoted — at least 11 — received the same or less pay than their predecessors. And overall, the average pay of White House staffers actually declined.

Since the story first appeared, this chart has gone viral. It has been picked up and circulated through emails — typically without the original story

Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 11:09 AM | Reply #6 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/19/2006
Location: ND
fishmahn Said:
Maybe you people should check fact check . org or at least empty your spam e-mail.s a chart claiming to show the "top 20 raises" to White House staffers accurate?

A: It's misleading. The salary increases for 19 of the 21 employees listed resulted from promotions. Average pay for White House staff actually declined.

FULL QUESTION

Please check date and accuracy of raises to executive staff. Thank you.

White House Raises . . . What!
Observe the raises given to Obama Administrative Staff below !
⬐ Click to expand/collapse the full text ⬏

FULL ANSWER

A larger version of the chart can be found here at Gawker — a gossip site that published the chart to accompany a July 6 article headlined "White House Staffers Got a Raise Last Year, And You Did Not." The White House told Gawker that the new salaries were the result of promotions or increased work responsibilities. We reviewed the White House salary data and found that 19 of the 21 staffers listed in the chart received both salary increases and new job titles. (Yes, there were 21 staffers, not 20, in the chart.) The majority of those promoted — at least 11 — received the same or less pay than their predecessors. And overall, the average pay of White House staffers actually declined.

Since the story first appeared, this chart has gone viral. It has been picked up and circulated through emails — typically without the original story

Classic!

Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 11:12 AM | Reply #7 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 12/30/2010
Location: nd
In case you didn't read the above report perhaps you should notice what you gave so much credence to is classified as a "Gossip" site. Now I've three site that I know are frequented by several here,...Heartland Institute, GAwkers and the National Enquirer!!!
Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 11:16 AM | Reply #8 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/19/2006
Location: ND
fishmahn Said:
In case you didn't read the above report perhaps you should notice what you gave so much credence to is classified as a "Gossip" site. Now I've three site that I know are frequented by several here,...Heartland Institute, GAwkers and the National Enquirer!!!
If that was directed at me, I was actually laughing with you . . . I find it funny how people jump to conclusions without even attempting to verify information. Maybe they should use one of these:



Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 11:18 AM | Reply #9 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 05/24/2008
Location: Mo
If these people"s rasies depending on Obama"s approval numbers they would be working for nothing or less than nothing.  


"Maybe you people should check fact check . org or at least empty your spam e-mail.
What does your fact shhet say about Obama"s poll numbers?  Why are they so low?

You run your mouth about everything else and been asked many times but not enough balls to answer why are Obama's poll numbers so low?
 
Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 11:21 AM | Reply #10 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 12/30/2010
Location: nd
Nanky, no it wasn't,  I was detained from posting it right away and I didn't see your post until later.    It was in reference to the silly guys that posted the Gawkers spam.
Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 11:29 AM | Reply #11 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 12/30/2010
Location: nd
Mauser-Maybe you should look these up before you get all huffy as you tend to get. This is nothing different then what Reagen experienced in 83, Hw Bush in 92 and GW Bush in 2005-2008. Actually GW was worse. Sometimes questionhs are periodically ignored if they're deemed rediculous in the first place. Have a great day!
Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 11:31 AM | Reply #12 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 12/30/2010
Location: nd
Mauser- you can check this out in the Wall Street Journal.
Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 11:43 AM | Reply #13 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 05/24/2008
Location: Mo
fishmahn Said:
Mauser-Maybe you should look these up before you get all huffy as you tend to get. This is nothing different then what Reagen experienced in 83, Hw Bush in 92 and GW Bush in 2005-2008. Actually GW was worse. Sometimes questionhs are periodically ignored if they're deemed rediculous in the first place. Have a great day!

I didn't ask about the Bushes numbers I asked why are Obamas are so low. You have an answer for eveything else true or untrue.  Why are Obama's numbers so low?  Why is the cause of Obama's poll numbers?   Enlighten everyone one and tell us why are Obama's so low and maybe you could you tell us how they got to there.  Remmber the Bush's are not running.   

 
Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 12:02 PM | Reply #14 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 05/24/2008
Location: Mo
I will answer for you it is called creditably!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This man has it right!!


Obama is victim of Bush's failed promises
Greener Pastures Column

Barack Obama is setting a record-setting number of records during his first year in office.
Largest budget ever. Largest deficit ever. Largest number of broken promises ever. Most self-serving speeches ever. Largest number of agenda-setting failures ever. Fastest dive in popularity ever.

Wow! Talk about change.

Just one year ago, fresh from his inauguration celebrations, President Obama was flying high. After one of the nation's most inspiring political campaigns, the election of America 's first black president had captured the hopes and dreams of millions. To his devout followers, it was inconceivable that a year later his administration would be gripped in self-imposed crisis.

Of course, they don't see it as self-imposed. It's all George Bush's fault.

George Bush, who doesn't have a vote in congress and who no longer occupies the White House, is to blame for it all.

He broke Obama's promise to put all bills on the White House web site for five days before signing them.

He broke Obama's promise to have the congressional health care negotiations broadcast live on C-SPAN.

He broke Obama's promise to end earmarks.

He broke Obama's promise to keep unemployment from rising above 8 percent.

He broke Obama's promise to close the detention center at Guantanamo in the first year.

He broke Obama's promise to make peace with direct, no precondition talks with America 's most hate-filled enemies during his first year in office, ushering in a new era of global cooperation.

He broke Obama's promise to end the hiring of former lobbyists into high White House jobs.

He broke Obama's promise to end no-compete contracts with the government.

He broke Obama's promise to disclose the names of all attendees at closed White House meetings.

He broke Obama's promise for a new era of bipartisan cooperation in all matters.

He broke Obama's promise to have chosen a home church to attend Sunday services with his family by Easter of last year.

Yes, it's all George Bush's fault. President Obama is nothing more than a puppet in the never-ending failed Bush administration.

If only George Bush wasn't still in charge, all of President Obama's problems would be solved. His promises would have been kept, the economy would be back on track, Iran would have stopped its work on developing a nuclear bomb and would be negotiating a peace treaty with Israel . North Korea would have ended its tyrannical regime, and integrity would have been restored to the federal government.

Oh, and did I mention what it would be like if the Democrats, under the leadership of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, didn't have the heavy yoke of George Bush around their necks? There would be no ear marks, no closed-door drafting of bills, no increase in deficit spending, no special-interest influence (unions), no vote buying (Nebraska, Louisiana).

If only George Bush wasn't still in charge, we'd have real change by now.

All the broken promises, all the failed legislation and delay (health care reform, immigration reform) is not President Obama's fault or the fault of the Democrat-controlled Congress. It's all George Bush's fault

Take for example the decision of Eric Holder, the president's attorney general, to hold terrorists' trials in New York City . Or his decision to try the Christmas Day underpants bomber as a civilian.

Two disastrous decisions.

Certainly those were bad judgments based on poor advice from George Bush.

Need more proof?

You might recall that when Scott Brown won the election to the U.S. Senate from Massachusetts , capturing "the Ted Kennedy seat", President Obama said that Brown's victory was the result of the same voter anger that propelled Obama into office in 2008. People were still angry about George Bush and the policies of the past 10 years. And they wanted change.

Yes, according to the president, the voter rebellion in Massachusetts was George Bush's fault.

Therefore, in retaliation, they elected a Republican to the Ted Kennedy seat, ending a half-century of domination by Democrats. It is all George Bush's fault.

Will the failed administration of George Bush ever end, and the time for hope and change ever arrive?

Will President Obama ever accept responsibility for something... - anything?

(Chuck Green is a veteran Colorado journalist and former editor-in-chief of The Denver Post.)    
 

 
 

“If we're not supposed to eat animals, how come they're made out of meat?”

 
 
espringers, when people talk of corporate America moving jobs out of this country, ALL the reasons why it is being done should be addressed. There are legitimate concerns you mention of loopholes ect... But have you ever heard the likes of Jon Stewart, Rachel Maddoux, Chris Mathews (the more accepted "mainstream" "left leaning
 
Re: Top 20 White Houses Raises last year
by on 08/29/2011 1:00 PM | Reply #15 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/27/2010
Location: ND
Why are Obamas poll numbers so low?
Posted By: Birdhunter81
Posted On: 08/29/2011 08:54 AM
1408 Views, 38 Comments
Rate This ForumTopic
  • Currently 3/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

3/5 (2 votes cast)

You must be signed in to comment on this topic







Total Outdoor Network
TON Sites | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use



North Dakota Fishing and Hunting | Minnesota Fishing and Hunting | Wisconsin Fishing and Hunting | Nebraska Fishing and Hunting | Walleye Fishing | South Dakota Fishing and Hunting | Alaska Fishing and Hunting |